THIS IS ARCHIVED CONTENT

Visit our new site at BusinessJournalism.org

Reynolds Center Programs Daylong Workshops Online Seminars One-hour Tutorials Barlett & Steele Awards Professors Seminar Strictly Financials Seminar Research Covering Business
Business Beats
Starting Out Business Writing Business Design Business Glossary Ethics Five Questions with... Immigration Series Business Journalism Resources Job Listings Academic Programs Book Listings and Reviews Scholarships Calculators Web Resources Tutorials Article Index Workshop Registration

The Reynolds Center has announced its 2009-10 free workshop schedule.

Select a workshop and register from the drop-down menu below.

Online Seminars

The Reynolds Center registration for Fall 2009 free online seminars.

Subscribe

Strength in Storytelling
By Dick Weiss

Five Questions with Brian O'Connor
By Ashley Macha

Warning: Don't Slash Business Coverage
By Chris Roush

Playing into a Career Niche
By Kelly Carr

Five Questions with Rich Greifner
By Amy Eagleburger

Five Questions with Rich Greifner

E-mail to a friend Print this article

Rich Greifner is a senior analyst with The Motley Fool and writes about investing for the company’s Web site, motleyfool.com. One of his recent articles raised questions about whether or not a recession is always negative for the stock market. Greifner recently spoke with Amy Eagleburger of businessjournalism.org about the media’s coverage of the economic slowdown and what business journalists can do to better inform their readers about the “R” word.

1. What are some misconceptions about recessions that business journalists might be furthering in their coverage?
My biggest pet peeve about the recession coverage: the assumption that a recession will necessarily spell doom for U.S. stocks for the foreseeable future.  This simply isn’t true. As I pointed out in my article, the U.S. has experienced 11 recessions since 1945, and the stock market actually rose during seven of those periods.

2. Is it possible for the U.S. to come through this slump without ever technically being in a recession?
Sure, I guess. We might be in a recession already. We may never enter one.  It’s really just a classification employed by a bunch of economists.

3. Do you feel like coverage has been too negative or too positive on the current economic situation?
The coverage has been negatively skewed because that’s what readers are responding to right now: Fear. At first blush, “recession” is a very scary term, especially after the long period of prosperity we’ve just experienced.  Once you dig a little deeper, you realize a recession isn’t that bad – it’s a natural part of the business cycle.

4. Does the classification "recession" really mean that much?
I think the recession classification is meaningless. By the time the National Bureau of Economic Research determines that we’re officially “in a recession,” odds are the economy will already be rebounding.

5. What would make current coverage of the economy better?
I’d love to see the financial press adopt a longer-term perspective. This fixation on short-term economic indicators has really spooked individual investors. That’s especially unfortunate because I think there are a lot of quality companies trading at enticing valuations right now. I’d like to see more positive stories – something like: Here are a few companies that will emerge stronger from a recession, or a few companies that have been excessively punished.

Email this article

Please enter your friend's e-mail address

Please enter your e-mail address

If you would like to include a message, please add it here:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Copyright © 2008 Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism